Last month we wrote about our production of SAY THEIR NAME, a promotional video for THE COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS – you can read about that here SAY THEIR NAME – a TCF video.
This month’s brilliant news is that SAY THEIR NAME is to be launched at THE HOUSE OF LORDS – next Tuesday 9th July. Â Â Along with promoting THE COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS new website, the launch is the part of a new publicity drive to raise awareness of the charity, the work that it does, and the Â needs of bereaved parents and siblings (and grandparents and friends) everywhere.
It is estimated that in the UK alone, over 6000 children under 20 die each year leaving behind 30,000 to 40,000 newly bereaved relatives. Â Â While not restricting its support to any age group, THE COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS believes that the death of a child (of any age) is ‘unnatural” and “not in the right order of things” and will leave relatives and close friends in an extreme state of uncertainty, confusion and disbelief. Â As we so well know, this is a state of trauma that is best overcome with the knowledge that you are not alone. Â Â But in our ‘death averse’ culture, it is difficult to breakout of the isolation many bereaved families feel. Â And that’s where The Compassionate Friends comes in. Â Â Its still a small charity but is run by and for bereaved parents and siblings, with a thriving internet forum, lots of local groups and a 24 hour helpline. Â Â Â The aim of the new film and website is help it grow and to help more parents like us to find comfort Â and support in the long road that is ‘the grief for a child.’
You can watch the full length version of SAY THEIR NAME here –
Following the success of Â SAY THEIR NAME, we are now planning to Â expand (if that’s the right word) BEYOND GOODBYE as a fully fledged film and video production company, making shorts and promos for charitable and non-profit organisations. Â Â We will also be accepting commissions for personal life stories, funeral videos and celebratory tributes. Â Â Â If you want to know more or want to make use of our talents (remember Jimmy is a Bafta award winning Televison editor of some 25 years experience) please contact us, either by the CONTACT FORMÂ or E mailing firstname.lastname@example.org.
Death is always a shock. Even though Joshâ€™s grandpa Gerry had been living with dementia for a good many years; even though he had recently been moved to the end of life ward at the hospital where he spent the last four of those years;Â even though we had been told that his temperature had dropped to 31 C, that he had been put on the Liverpool Care Pathway and was not expected to last for more than a few days or weeks; even though we had visited him and could see for ourselves that Gerry would not â€œbe getting up from this oneâ€, still death comes as a shock.
Joshâ€™s Grandpa is Janeâ€™s dad and we loved him very much.Â That is why his death, his life no more, is still hard to take in.Â Gerry was 95 and had had a good and inventful (sic) life.Â The obituary in the Glasgow Herald headlined him as â€œbusinessman, inventor and pilot who taught Prince Philip to fly.â€Â Â He was nearly 80 when his last creation, a revolutionary fire fighting device,Â won the John Logie Baird Award for innovation in 1996. Â Â We are sad to see him go, but we are at peace with his passing. Â Unlike Joshâ€™s, Gerryâ€™s death is in the natural order of things. Â Â Â If there is a timetable for death, if there is fairness in death, then clearly Josh died too soon and Gerry perhaps too late.
But justice is a concern for the living – for death itself there is no moral dilemma.Â Â It remains for us who would still breathe to make an account of these deaths, to mourn them as we do, and to wonder if there can be anything like a good death.
By strange coincidence, on the weekend between Gerryâ€™s death and his funeral, Jane and IÂ had attended a symposium on â€œwhat makes a good deathâ€.Â Â Organized by the Wellcome Foundation, and intended to contribute to a growing conversation about death and dying, we were both curious about how others were dealing with and talking about this so-called â€˜difficultâ€™ subject.Â Â Â The show opened with various readings from literature including Roger McGoughâ€™s poem …
Let me die a youngman’s death
not a clean and inbetween
the sheets holywater death
not a famous-last-words
peaceful out of breath death
When I’m 73 and in constant good tumour may I be mown down at dawn by a bright red sports car on my way home from an all night party â€¦.
It continues in similar vein.Â Â Â Â To my mind a rather distasteful attempt to glamorize death, to sanitize it and to take death away from its natural place as a conclusion to lifeâ€™s inevitable story.Â Â Â In these lines you can find both Gerry and Joshua but neither of these deaths were in reality what McGough would wish for as his own â€˜goodâ€™ death â€“ Josh never got to be 73 and Gerry,Â instead of a slow decline to a morphined non-existenceÂ would,Â I suspect, much rather have gone out with a bang.
What the poem does point to though is the wish to have some kind of conscious control over how we die.Â Â In modern society this is presented almost as a consumer choice; the planned for death, with living wills and demands for legally assisted suicide.Â The more agency we have, the better our death will be â€“ if it is we, that is, who are doing the dying.Â Â Â Â But what of those left behind?Â Â Â After â€˜ourâ€™ death it is still left to the living to mourn the nature, tragic or otherwise, and the consequences of our death.Â Â Â So perhaps a better question to be asking is â€œwho is the good death for â€“ the living or the dead?â€Â Â Â Or both.Â Â Â If we understand our lives, our individual selfish lives to have meaning only in relationship with others, (â€¦â€¦ no man is an island etc) then our dying and our being dead can only find fitting resonance with the survivors of our death.Â Â Â For both Gerry and Joshua who now know no more of their lives, this is actually meaningless.Â Â Â For us it couldnâ€™t be more relevant.
While Gerry’s was to be expected, the unnatural circumstances of Joshuaâ€™s death precludes an easy ‘inbetween the sheets’ kind of mourningÂ as we struggle to continue our relationship with him. Â His life cut short creates a vacuum not only in our hearts but also in the story we would want to tell of him: we fill it by projecting our wishes and ambitions for himÂ on to the future he never had.Â Â Â If Josh were alive now, heâ€™d have found another job, heâ€™d have found another lover, heâ€™d have traveled again, set up his own video production company making underwater music films, he might even have gone back to college.Â Our dreams for Joshua will forever haunt our nights and days, but we have no need for such fantasies for what an old man might do with the rest of his life.Â Â Â Â A good death is perhaps possible only after, what McGoughâ€™s poem doesnâ€™t reveal, that which makes for a good and full life, as lived by Jane’s Dad, Gerry.
How then to tell of the life that gave life â€“ that gave life to Jane and thence to Josh and our other children?Â Â Â I have known Gerry for as long as I have known his daughter.Â My first encounter with him was when he took us out for dinner soon after the two of us had got together.Â I was immediately taken and excited by his anarchic behaviour, his unabashed sociability and his seeming need to display both as publicly as possible.Â Â If there was a table to dance on heâ€™d be the first on it.
Gerry Harris was an engineer by trade, but I knew him best as a difficult father, an over protective husband, a terrible businessman, a gifted if slightly bonkers inventor.Â Â Â Gerryâ€™s triumph was BLASTER, a water jet that started life as a new form of garden sprinkler but ended up as a fire fighting device that could drench flames in seconds and with minimal water damage.Â Â Gerry had first showed me his creation a few years before and we now have precious video footage of him running round his garden in the pouring rain as he attempts to activate a series of sprinklers made from bits of bicycle and beer bottle caps.Â Â These rudimentaryÂ contraptions were to become BLASTER or â€¦ wait for it â€“ â€˜Boundary Layer And Surface Tension Energy Releaseâ€™.Â By introducing a carefully positioned rotor blade in the path of the water jet Gerry had found a way to turn water (a liquid) into water vapour (a gas), so reducing the amount of water needed to put out a fire by a thousand fold.Â Â Gerry was not only well into his 80â€™s when he discovered this but also well on the way to establishing a principle that may still revolutionize fire control. Â Â
If Gerry had a â€˜goodâ€™ life how was his death? Â Or how was his â€˜dyingâ€™?
Gerry began his last journey 5 years ago when after a series of small strokes he developed vascular dementia, a cruel disease that slowly robs the person of their capacity to reason and to hold thoughts in any meaningful way.Â From our visits to see him over this time itâ€™s difficult to say whether Gerryâ€™s emotional being, his own personhood, suffered a similar decline. Â The one question the family always seemed to be asking â€“ how much of Gerry is still there? â€“ was never really answered.Â But death stalked that question at every turn as the frustrations of the disease and its affects on other members of the family began to take its toll.Â Â That and the inadequacies of the care system that Gerry seem to be caught up in â€“ all seemed to conspire to invite deathâ€™s continual refrain â€“ when shall you summon me?
In fact Gerry exhibited super human strength in his will to stay alive.Â Â Whilst in hospital he broke his hip twice occasioning major surgery both times and was later sent back to the ICU with a collapsed lung.Â Gerry was fit.Â He had incredible energy both mental and physical.Â Despite the progress of the disease Gerry remained bored out of his mind, and despite being confined in his chair, no longer able to walk, he remained constantly on edge with an almost manic inability to sit still.Â Â Â Ironically it was this energy that would keep him living with the distressing effects of dementia for so long.
You can see something of Gerry’s life in this short film we prepared for the family to watch the day before his funeral. Â Â An early scene in which Gerry recites one of his favorite poems was filmed shortly after he was admitted to hospital. Â Click on play button in the bottom left of the screen.
Putting this film together was, as you might be able to imagine, a rather delightful experience, sad but rewarding and I was honoured to be able to do this for Gerry and for Jane’s mum Pat and her brothers. Â It felt like I was contributing to the postscript to a long and successful life story. Â Â What I was not doing was dealing with a trauma. Â In that sense their was no distress, no break down of confidence, no insecurity, no fear, all of which were so present in the months following Josh’s death. Â Â Equally and despite the initial shock of witnessing Gerry’s lifeless form, I suspect we will be able to ‘move on’ from his death in ways that we are not able to with Josh. Â This I think has to do with the way that we as parents are changed as a result of the death of our child – fundamentally and irrevocably changed.
By contrast to Joshâ€™s, Gerryâ€™s funeral was a very small affair, this partly because of Janeâ€™s mumâ€™s wish to keep it very low key and private, but also because of the simple fact that by the time you get to 95 you actually donâ€™t have many friends left to bid you farewell.Â Â Josh of course was known by many, old and young.Â Â Â If there over 300 who came to say goodbye to Josh, just 12 of us attended Gerryâ€™s funeral not including the celebrant and the funeral directors.Â Â But it was no less meaningful for that.Â Â Â There was something poignant in its very ordinariness that gave comfort to the idea that death is survivable, no matter if itâ€™s your grandfather or your son.
Joshua’s younger sister, Rosa is currently studying on a Foundation Art course at Oxford Brookes University. We are reproducing here an essay she has written as part of her course which explores the themes of photography and death and the way we use the medium as a way of creating memorials to people’s lives. In this essay Rosa posits some very challenging questions – how far, she asks, is the act of taking someone’s photograph a subconscious attempt “to protect ourselves for when that person dies?” To answer this she examines the work of Â three very different artists – the American photographer Nan Goldin who captured some of the most intimate and moving images from New York’s gay scene of the 1970’s and 80’s – London based photographer Briony Campbell’s whose “The Dad Project” was a way of saying goodbye with her camera to her father as he lay dying from cancer – and the work Â I have produced since Josh’s death, in particular my book “Released”.
I am seriously moved by Rosa’s ability and her desire to use her university projects as a way of understanding what her own work now means in the light of Joshua’s death and for being prepared to share those thoughts with us. Â Â (Jimmy)
Making it Real – Death and Photography
In my essay I will be exploring how we take photographs of loved ones with the possibly subconscious aim to memorialise that person after they have died and look at the ways in which we can turn found photos of a lost loved one into prominent memorials of their life.
How far is taking a photograph of someone a response to our fear of death? Is their fear their fear or is it ours? What power does the photograph hold? Does it comfort us in our grief and why? When images of death are all around us, why do we shy away from post-mortem images of people we have known and loved?
I will be structuring the essay around the three stages of taking images as a memorial that I have concluded from some of my research:
-Â Â Â Â Â Taking images before someone has died, when they are certainly alive and healthy yet, with the subconscious idea that the photograph will almost certainly outlive them.
-Â Â Â Â Â Taking images of someone as they physically die, a concept that is almost unheard of in our culture. I ask could this be a way of helping us prepare for their death?
-Â Â Â Â Â Finally, taking and using images of the person after they have died.
NAN GOLDIN – keeping the memory alive
For a long time the work of New York photographer, Nan Goldin has inspired and influenced my own work. She takes very personal and intimate images of her close friends. She photographs them relaxing at their houses, their drug use and abuse and during sex. Nan Goldinâ€™s body of work is often very shocking to the greater public and has frequently acted as an expose of life during the AIDS epidemic. She recorded some of the most intimate moments of herself and of her friendsâ€™ lives.
Goldin grew up in Boston,Â â€œin the very middleâ€ of a middle class neighbourhood. When Nan was 11 her older sister who was 18 committed suicide. In Goldinâ€™s documentary film, â€˜Iâ€™ll be your mirrorâ€™, she implies that her sisterâ€™s death was a catalyst not just for her photography in general but also for the intimate and personal style of her images.
After leaving college she moved to New Yorkâ€™s lower East Side where she began documenting the post â€˜stonewallâ€™ gay scene of the late seventies –â€œinstead of dying at 18, I started to photograph.â€ Goldin now acknowledges that her sisterâ€™s untimely death really shaped her photography in a very subconscious way. She reflects on her photography in the documentary commenting that she â€œbecame obsessed with never losing the memory of anyone againâ€. The irony of course was that by the 1990â€™s many of her subjects were dead either from aids or from drug overdoses. Goldinâ€™s photographs use an intimate snapshot aesthetic and read rather like a private diary made public. The images all show real moments and real people and let the viewer into her life.
Iniatially Goldin took photographs for her personal use. But doÂ portraits taken as a commission or for more public viewing Â have the same â€˜death instinctâ€™? British photographer David Bailey believes they do:Â â€œPhotography is all about death reallyâ€¦ you look at [old] pictures-theyâ€™re always dead. You donâ€™t look at a painting and think â€˜sheâ€™s deadâ€™ but you look at a photograph and think â€˜sheâ€™s dead!â€™
Do we all take photographs of the people that we love to capture them in case of death or to protect ourselves for when that â€˜subjectâ€™ dies? When you are taking an image of a loved one it transforms from just a photograph into a memory, a character and a relationship. This is the element for me, which makes the works of artists such as Goldin so significant and so beautiful.
Cookie Mueller – 1981
â€˜The Cookie Portfolioâ€™ as Goldin names it, is a series of fifteen photographs taken over thirteen years of Cookie Mueller â€“ â€œthe starlet of the Lower East Sideâ€ and the â€œqueen of the downtown social sceneâ€. The images illustrate Cookieâ€™s character and vitality yet also captures her deterioration and eventual death from AIDS in 1989.
â€œI used to think that I could never lose anyone if I photographed them enough. I put together this series of pictures of Cookie from the 13 years I knew her in order to keep her with me. In fact they show me how much Iâ€™ve lost.â€
â€œThe Cookie Portfolioâ€ is an excellent example of the way a photographic record of anyone can come to have such a power after they have died.
Goldinâ€™s dilemma highlights a basic contradiction in all photographic portraits especially those of people who have then died; their photograph has an incredible likeness of being to the subject, it invites us to accept consolation from their living image yet, it can also a painful reminder that they are now gone.
The last image in Goldinâ€™s Cookie Portfolio is of Cookie in her coffin. It is extraordinary that in a series of photographs intended to keep the memory of her friend alive that she would include a photograph of her corpse.
Extraordinary not just because of Goldinâ€™s fear of losing her friends â€˜livingâ€™ memory, but more because in her life and her art she is surrounded by the deaths of those close to her yet, this picture of Cookie in her coffin is one of only a very few she has published of a dead friend. Sex, drugs, deviance, yes â€“ death, no.
However, rewind to the nineteenth century and images of dead people, especially babies, were very common, socially accepted and even valued. At this time, infant mortality was very high and a lot of the time there wouldnâ€™t be enough time to make a photograph of the child before it had died. So the families would photograph the deceased openly and unfortunately this occurred often as in those days infant death was more commonplace.
While images of death as part of our daily news intake, such as the killing of Bin Laden, are quite acceptable, people who now want a post-mortem record can face social opprobrium if they were to take a picture or commission someone to do so. People on the television and in the newspapers remain characters and donâ€™t seem to be real people but people donâ€™t want to acknowledge the death of someone close to them by taking a photograph. Similarly, a lot of people live in the mindset that if we donâ€™t acknowledge death by photographing it then maybe it hasnâ€™t happened.
When my own brother Joshua died last year and I went to see his body in the funeral parlour I didnâ€™t take a photograph. It was impossible for me to do so not only because I was using all of my emotional energy to process what was happening leaving no room for the camera, also it simply isnâ€™t the done thing nowadays.
Perhaps for Goldin who lived through her camera and often shielded herself with it, taking the picture of Cookieâ€™s corpse was a necessary confirmation of her death. For me, the support of my family meant that there was no need to record his lifeless form for posterity – above all it was just too painful.
From personal experience Iâ€™ve learnt that we tend to shy away from photographs that depict images of the dead especially when the deceased Â is a loved one. Yet, it is surprising that in popular contemporary culture, there are still few acceptable ways of recording the rituals surrounding death and mourning process. When families get together it is often around important moments such as births, marriages and funerals, the latter being the event least photographed. Unlike weddings, there is no industry for funeral photography or videos. This seems strange to me, as death is the only inevitable event in someoneâ€™s life. After my brothers death, we as a family collected all the pictures of Josh that we could – a hugely important part of our efforts to come to terms with our loss; these were of course all pictures of Josh alive. Overnight, they had all become memorial photographs â€“ each snapshot acquiring more poignancyâ€¦ and over time these â€˜foundâ€™ images of Joshua have gained even more significance being used over and over again: at the funeral, parties, memorial days, and given to people as gifts. For example, the images below were both images which gained significance from their first use as his business card, now as a memento for people to put in their wallets and on their walls to remember Josh.Â Like Goldin we were using his photograph as a way of keeping Joshua alive.
Above – the photograph Josh used for his business card
This image was reproduced and given to mourners at Josh’s funeral
Images, like the ones of Josh, seem to become an icon of a personâ€™s life. On the surface we take images to represent memories and relationships but, when a tragedy happens, I have realised that maybe we take images to prematurely memorialise that character and protect ones self from the inevitable. The images grant us with satisfaction by showing an exact visual replication of that person whilst still alive but at the same time the photos will now always be a reminder that they are now not alive.
JIMMY EDMONDS – RELEASED – the photographic illusion
A few weeks later after we received his ashes back from the crematorium, my father, Jimmy Edmonds, started on a photographic project that would be both a memorial to my brother and a record of the way our family was dealing with our loss.
This project was published with the title RELEASED. Â Â It can be seen in full here. Â He started by photographing Josh’s ashes; he captured them pouring through the air and the clouds of dust that they created.
He then experimented with laying the ashes on top of the photograph shown above of Joshua that had gained significance from being used at the funeral and over and over again. When put together, the ashes and the image formed conflicting ideas: on the one hand, we can see Josh alive, with him looking back to us, placing us in an illusion letting us believe that he is still alive, but the ashes tell us that he is most definitely dead.
The thing about a photograph is that even though it captures a moment in time it will almost always outlive its subject matter. My Dad wanted to find a way of making images that more accurately reflected the long process of mourning. Again using a photograph heâ€™d taken of Josh, the one used as his business card, he hand printed them using a nineteenth century technique that used vegetable juice and sunlight – anthotypes. He then combined these bright red images with the ashes and physically stuck the two together. There is no way to fix an anthotype print – in time they will fade. Over time all that will remain will be the ashes of Josh. Nearly all photographs act as an aide-memoir and as such are deceptive. This series of images speaks more to our current reality of life without Josh.
My father was able to use the ashes as a creative material and make some beautiful images not only for the people that knew Josh but also for many people that did not know him. They felt privileged and touched that he had â€˜let them inâ€™ to such a tender and normally private part of Â our family life by witnessing Joshâ€™s actual ashes as a piece of art.
â€œAll that remains will be â€“ all that remains.â€
BRIONY CAMPBELL – saying goodbye with her camera
My father had time to think about his project – (when someone dies, it is after all forever!). When Briony Campbell’s father was diagnosed with cancer he was told that he had just nine months to live. Briony decided to document this with a series of photographs and an accompanying video called The Dad Project. Unlike Goldin’s work, this was a very much conscious process where both father and daughter collaborated. Each of them had to think carefully about what doing this project would mean for them both:
â€œI agonised for months over whether I should attempt to photograph our relationship at allâ€.
We learn from her video that for her father the project meant getting to know his daughter in new ways and spending the last of his days doing something worthwhile and productive. For Briony it was more of a way to say goodbye. She was able to use her camera as a medium to do this, but I suspect that at times it was also a way to distance herself from the reality of the situation.
â€œEach day that brought his imminent death into sharper focus, my project became more of a crutch, and more of a member of the family. When we had nothing to be positive about, the project gave us a way to be productiveâ€
For my father the photographic process he undertook was more of a reflection on my brotherâ€™s death once he had already gone. Campbellâ€™s project was of the moment and dealt with the emotions she had as her father was dying. She did not know what was going to happen next or when exactly he would die from his terminal illness:
â€œWhen you find out youâ€™re going to lose someone you love you donâ€™t know what the story is, so you really canâ€™t plan how to tell it.â€
When we think of images of a dying family member many people are likely to conjure up stereotypical images associated with death – morbid and painful images that could capture pain, suffering, fear or a variety of other negative emotions associated with death. Of course Campbellâ€™s â€˜The Dad Projectâ€™ series includes those images. But Campbell also creates a story about love. She does this by creating beautiful photographs in a hopeless situation. The video includes humorous chats with her father and I found myself smiling whilst watching it. Similarly, amongst the heartfelt, painful images are picturesque images of light and colour.
â€œIf it were a painful moment, I tried to make the picture more aesthetically beautifulâ€.
“Today we knew he would die soon. I went outside and looked at the sky while we waited for the ambulance.”
The series contains both pictures of Campbellâ€™s father as well as some self-portraits although, I would argue that the self-portraits are images of her father dying too. I think these are some of the most important images in the series as they show her bravery. To let people see you at your weakest and most vulnerable I find really incredible. In my opinion these self-portraits fuse the series together as they put the whole thing into context by showing not only the experience of the fatherâ€™s illness but also the impact the illness has on his daughter. This has the result of humanising the whole process. Death here is not a news item, but an everyday occurence.
By taking the images of her father with the conscious aim to memorialise the pictures even before he died, to then take images of herself shows a great understanding and coming to terms with death in general. By photographing herself she is essentially preparing herself for when she dies and exploring this through the images – for me, she is memorialising herself in the images using the same idea of taking a photograph to be there when you are dead.
Most of memorial photography exists of images of smiling people aiming to remember the happy times of a personâ€™s life. Campbellâ€™s work is more of a realistic representation of death and includes photographs that are undoubtedly hard to look at, though the series does also include happy and amusing images. By creating a more rounded view of death and dying, Campbell has somehow reduced the fear that many people have of death. I was able to relate to this by thinking back to the funeral we held for Josh. On the day I felt a bit strange that I wasnâ€™t sad all of the time and I felt quite at ease and cheerful at points through out the day â€“ a lot of our friends said they enjoyed the day and I wouldnâ€™t necessarily disagree.
Part of life is that everyone has to die. It is inevitable. At the very least, The Dad Project, opens a door to people and lets them in to this delicate journey.
What becomes clear is that although all three photographers are responding to their encounter with death in very different ways, they are all using photography as a way of coming to terms with loss. For Goldin, photographing her friends is a kind of insurance policy, creating mementos for when they are no longer here. Campbell documents the journey into death in a truly collaborative way and my father is trying to produce new images from my brothers actual remains. And by confronting death and making it real they all go some way to dispelling our fears.
Rosa Harris Edmonds
Keep up to date with what I am doing at university and in my personal projectsÂ here and here.
Briony’s film, ‘Saying goodbye with my camera’ can Â be seen here.
Briony’s photographs of ‘The Dad Project’ can be seen here.